The Culture of Fear continues to touch upon important issues like the fact that black men are not to fear but rather the prejudice we as a nation inadvertently, and sometimes purposely, instill in ourselves against them. People like journalism instructor Caryl Rivers have made racist accusations saying "night after night, black men rob, rape, loot, and pillage in the living room," failing to realize that like black men, white men and men of every other race do the same things and often worse. Editor John Bogart said "When a dog bites a man that is not news, when a man bites a dog, that is news," and still the media seems to indefinitely paint a portrait of an innocent white victim, murdered by the hands of a black monster. So why is not the white victim story considered a cliche? Maybe this country has a "if you can't beat, 'em jail 'em" attitude towards black men, because various organizations like the anti-rap campaigns worked to pass laws that put rappers, who mind you are majority black, in jail for suggestive lyrics. Why work hard to end one genre of music for bad lyrics when every genre has a few risky songs, especially that old southern loved country? Black men and crack have been the explanations for distress in this country every since they've been here. Crack has been put on a pedestal by the media as the sole blame for all inner city trouble, when truly it was just a cover up for the poor socioeconomic state of the ghetto. Why crackdown on less common street drugs like crack, when the real issue is that people are getting their drugs legally through doctors? Glassner suggests that maybe it has something to do with, again, jailing who people feel unfit for their "perfect" society.
- Why has little emphasis been put on the issue of legal drugs as opposed to crack or heroine?